金沙国际官方网址

图片 3
卡萨布兰卡湾实验室,北大蒙特利尔学士院维生素工程与酶催化设计团队,诚聘蛋白组学、酶工程、生化、分子生物学实验博后
金沙国际官方网址 1
金沙国际官方网址60年治理 江西咸宁860万亩流沙重披绿装

金沙国际官方网址Why I do not like the pay-to-publish model?

  1. I do not have money. Although I work for a univeristy, I do a lot of
    smaller, unfunded reseraches out of my own interest. So far I have
    been able to get them published without paying a dime.

  2. Getting my papers published free gives me a sense of pride: my work
    is valuable enough that a journal is willing to publish it at their
    own expense. Paying to publish would make feel more like an
    advertisment.

  3. I believe that the business model of jouranls charging the libraries
    or other subscibers provides a stronger motivation for a journal to
    strive for higher quality. I do not have theory or data to back up
    this statement. But I do know that some pay-to-publish journals
    totally publish junk but I know no journals that do not charge the
    author survive this way.

Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to
keep it for themselves. The world’s entire scientific and cultural
heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is
increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private
corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results
of the sciences? You’ll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like
Reed Elsevier.

Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to
keep it for themselves. The world’s entire scientific and cultural
heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is
increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private
corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results
of the sciences? You’ll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like
Reed Elsevier.

There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has
fought valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights
away but instead ensure their work is published on the Internet, under
terms that allow anyone to access it. But even under the best scenarios,
their work will only apply to things published in the future. Everything
up until now will have been lost.

There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has
fought valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights
away but instead ensure their work is published on the Internet, under
terms that allow anyone to access it. But even under the best scenarios,
their work will only apply to things published in the future. Everything
up until now will have been lost.

That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read
the work of their colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only
allowing the folks at Google to read them? Providing scientific articles
to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to children
in the Global South? It’s outrageous and unacceptable.

That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read
the work of their colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only
allowing the folks at Google to read them? Providing scientific articles
to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to children
in the Global South? It’s outrageous and unacceptable.

“I agree,” many say, “but what can we do? The companies hold the
copyrights, they make enormous amounts of money by charging for access,
and it’s perfectly legal — there’s nothing we can do to stop them.” But
there is something we can, something that’s already being done: we can
fight back.

金沙国际官方网址,“I agree,” many say, “but what can we do? The companies hold the
copyrights, they make enormous amounts of money by charging for access,
and it’s perfectly legal — there’s nothing we can do to stop them.” But
there is something we can, something that’s already being done: we can
fight back.

Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists
— you have been given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of
knowledge while the rest of the world is locked out. But you need not —
indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for yourselves. You
have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords
with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.

Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists
— you have been given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of
knowledge while the rest of the world is locked out. But you need not —
indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for yourselves. You
have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords
with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.

相关文章

No Comments, Be The First!
近期评论
    功能
    网站地图xml地图